Intoxilyzer 5000 issues

Lawyer Demands Intoxilyzer Source Code
San Diego DUI lawyer Rick Mueller reports on his California DUI Law Center blog about a Kentucky case involving a defendant's request to inspect the source code for a DUI Intoxilyzer 5000. The defendant argued that the State should not be allowed to introduce evidence from the Intoxilyzer if the defense was not allowed to examine how the Breathalyzer worked. (…)

State's Failure to Turn Over Intoxilyzer Source Code May Result in Dismissal of Charges
Joshua Topolsky of the Engaget blog reports that the Minnesota Supreme Court will hear arguments about whether the State of Minnesota and/or the manufacturer of the Intoxilyzer 5000 machine must turn over the source code that operates the Intoxilyzer equipment. In discovery motions, the defense had demanded the source code but both the State of Minnesota and manufactgurer CMI corporation have refused to release the code. (…)

DUI Laws Unfair to Women? - Detailed Scientific Proof
Defense lawyers frequently argue that tests used by the police to measure blood alcohol levels in women are flawed because most of these tests are calibrated using a "average" sized male and because there is some scientifice evidence that women metabolize alcohol differently than men. (…)

Intoxilyzer 5000 Pre-trial Discovery Motion Posted
In a gesture of appreciation to his fellow criminal defense lawyers, noted Marietta DUI lawyer Guy Sharpe has published his Motion for Full Information on the Intoxilyzer 5000. (…)

What is an "Intoxilyzer"
I have heard about breath tests and blood tests and about an intoxilyzer test. What is the difference in these various tests and what is an Intoxilyzer? (…)